“You wanna know what the mother of all bubbles was? Us. The human race.”
That’s Gordon Gekko in the distinctly-mediocre Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps.
This weekend brought a rush of stories about a “bubble” that may or may not be re-inflating in Silicon Valley. The New York Times kicked it off, venture capitalist Fred Wilson (who is featured prominently in the story) quickly responded, and then Newsweek weighed in just to make sure the “Bubble 2.0″ moniker was secure. Uh oh, right? Not so fast.
One giant nugget of information in the NYT piece (co-written by TechCrunch alum Evelyn Rusli) is a bit buried:
For starters, this is not a stock market bubble. None of the companies are publicly traded.
In other words, if this “bubble” were to pop, it wouldn’t be the mothers and fathers of the world hoping to put their children through school who would be getting screwed. It would be the private investors. It would be a handful of (mostly) rich people who would be out of some of their money.
I suppose the employees of the collapsing startups could also be screwed somewhat. But they’d undoubtedly find work again quickly. And the founders would start new companies. Just like after the first bubble.
Business Insider has a good rundown of the actually public tech companies — you know, the kind mom and pop can and do actually invest in. The consensus there? Pretty wonderful, actually. Not over-the-top outrageous, just very solid for the most part.
Now, that doesn’t mean a “Bubble 2.0″ couldn’t pop and adversely affect the overall ecosystem. In fact, I’m sure it would to some extent, mainly because less money coming in would mean less innovation across the board. But it wouldn’t cause everything to collapse.
We all just lived through a very real bubble. The housing bubble. The results of it popping almost completely brought down not only our own economy, but much of the world’s economy as well. Real people lost their life savings. People went to jail. More people should have been locked up forever. It’s almost insulting to mention this supposed new web bubble in the same breath as that.
Again, this “Bubble 2.0″, if it does exist, is mainly just troublesome for investors. Smaller angel investors, in particular, are getting squeezed out of deals because early stage valuations are getting ridiculously high in some cases.
Undoubtedly it’s true that some of those startups should not be accepting so much money at such valuations, but that’s on them. If they fail, it will be a lesson to other startups. Maybe the motto is: go big and go home (at least in the early stage).
Another underlying current here is that many private investors aren’t comfortable with the state of the startup ecosystem. And yet many of them continue to do deals that they may not be comfortable with. Again, that’s on them. They’re all doing due diligence. If they don’t think a deal is worth it, they obviously shouldn’t do it. But some don’t seem to be able to turn down their name being attached to a high-profile investment — even if projections have it panning out to be a 2x exit. (The horror!)
Maybe some of them would actually be more comfortable investing in what Wilson calls “The Mess“. That is, startups in their awkward years. They’re neither new and sexy nor mature and money-making. Not surprisingly, no one seems to want to invest in those, besides current investors. But maybe those are where some deals are to be found.
In the press, there are two kinds of sexy stories to write: over-exuberance and death. We just got done with a week’s worth of over–exuberance surrounding the Google/Groupon deal. Holy shit, $6 billion dollars for a company that has only really been at it for a little over a year? That’s awesome! Let the good times roll.
The deal ultimately fell apart and in came the death stories. There needs to be balance in the world, after all. We know this just as well as anyone. The $6 billion Groupon deal made web investing as hot as the sun for a few days. And now it’s a bubble.
But wait. “Bubble 2.0″ has existed before. Here it is in 2005 — with Wilson worrying about some of the same things he’s still worried about. And here it is again in 2007 — with John Dvorak worrying that social media among other things would pop the bubble. And wasn’t it for sure a bubble later that year when Microsoft invested in Facebook at a $15 billion valuation? I was sure I heard that over and over and over again. Turns out, that was a pretty damn awesome investment, strategic or not.
There are dozens of other examples as well.
So maybe this is actually “Bubble 4.0″ or “Bubble 5.0″. Or maybe it’s not a big bubble at all. After all, if it pops and gum gets over only a few faces, will anyone do anything other than point and laugh, then go on with their lives?
[image: 20th Century Fox]
This is the final in a three-part series. Read Part 1 here and Part II here.
In the previous two parts of this series I have recounted the multiple frauds perpetrated by MERS: it defrauded counties out of billions of dollars of reporting fees, it defrauded homeowners by destroying documents that provide a clear chain of title -- facilitating its foreclosure frauds, and it defrauded securities investors by failing to adhere to PSAs (pooling and servicing agreements) -- making their securities invalid. Now, in order to cover the trail of deceit MERS and the banks are stealing homes as fast as they can in the hope that no one will notice the fraud. Meanwhile, they are destroying real estate values and adding to the headwinds that are pushing our economy into the first great depression of the 21st century.
In this piece, let us step back and examine the big picture to answer the question: Why did Wall Street create this crisis? For the answer, we have got to go back several decades. I do not want to give a long-winded history lesson, but it is necessary to understand the transformation that has taken place since the 1960s. Back then, the financial system was small, simple, regulated and relatively unimportant. Banks made commercial loans; thrifts made home loans; and Wall Street handled investment finance. Households had jobs and rising wages so they didn't need to go into debt to finance rising consumption. With robust economic growth, each generation could expect to have roughly twice the living standard of the previous generation.
Things began to change in the 1970s, and especially in the 1980s as growth slowed, as median real wages stopped rising, and as financial institutions were unleashed to expand activities into new areas. At first households coped with stagnant incomes by putting more family members to work (especially women), but gradually they began to rely on debt. Banks created new kinds of credit and gradually expanded their views as to who is creditworthy. I can still remember one conference I attended at which someone from the financial sector proudly announced that the banks had discovered an untapped market for credit cards -- the "mentally retarded". The argument was that this group would be just as safe as college students, since parents would bail them out in order to avoid having their kids' credit ratings suffer. This was not a joke -- it was a business model.
With slower economic growth, it had become harder for American firms to make profits. They shifted their focus from actually producing goods and services to making money on financial products. GM and GE became primarily financial institutions that happened to make cars and light bulbs as a sideline business. Yes, you could buy a car made by GM, but the company made most of its profits on the auto loan. (It then branched out to -- you betcha -- mortgage backed securities and all other manner of risky assets. I hope readers understand that that is what the "auto" bail-out was all about.) As everyone got into the act of indiscriminate lending, banks found their own business dwindling -- so they had to continually innovate with new products and to find new activities to finance.
The economy became "financialized", as financial institutions inserted their activities into virtually every aspect of American life. Health care morphed into financialized health "insurance", given a huge boost by "Obamacare" legislation that for the first time in US history mandates that Americans turn their incomes over to private financial firms. Even death became financialized with "peasant insurance" (employers take out contracts on employees) and "death settlements" (life insurance policies on those with fatal illnesses are securitized and sold to gamblers betting on early death). Retailers increased the financialization of consumer goods -- they couldn't get enough profit on the sales or even on the consumer credit, so they offered "extended protection" on everything from TVs to toasters and then tried to scare customers with an unusual marketing pitch: the products they carry are so shoddily produced that insurance is necessary to protect the purchase.
Every kind of debt or insurance product became a financial commodity, packaged into a security and sliced and diced and bought and sold. At the same time, "insurance" (often in the form of credit default swaps) replaced underwriting (credit assessment) to make these loans more marketable. And then the credit default swap insurance, itself, became a way to bet on the death of securities, companies, and even nations. It is not a stretch to say that Wall Street's capitalists returned to their roots as "undertakers" (the old term for entrepreneurs), with death becoming their main line of business.
Debt grew. In 2007 just before the crisis hit, total US debt reached five times national income -- the previous record was just three times income, a level reached in the propitious year of 1929. In other words, each dollar of income had to service five dollars of debt. In the decade previous to the crisis, American households spent more than their incomes in almost every year. For every debtor created there is a creditor. Not surprisingly, creditors are richer than debtors. Over time, the proportion of Americans who were debtors grew, and the proportion of creditors fell. The rich got richer and every one else either got poorer or at best just managed to break even. In other words, the debt train fueled a massive redistribution of income and wealth to the very top. It is no coincidence that inequality in the US has returned to its previous peak -- reached, not coincidentally also in 1929. That is what President Bush actually meant when he talked about the ownership society -- a society in which a small elite would own everything.
Banks became giant one-stop casinos that facilitated every kind of crazy bet. They would make a loan to you, but then simultaneously securitize it to sell-on to an investor plus place a bet that you would default on your loan so that the security would go bad. For a fee, they'd let a hedge fund manager choose the riskiest loans to bundle into a sure-to-fail financial product that they would then sell to their own customers. And then they'd join the hedge fund in betting against their customers. The more loans they made, the more fees they collected; the more bad loans they made, the more bets they would win. The more debt they piled on households, the greater their profits; riskier debt meant even higher fees and more defaults and thus greater wins from gambling. Prospective death was a booming good business for our undertakers.
America became "Bubbleonia" -- with a "bubblicious" economy that moved from one bubble and crash to another: A commercial real estate bubble and crash in the 1980s that killed the thrifts; a series of developing country debt bubbles and crashes in the 1980s and 1990s fueled in part by American banks; a US stock market bubble and crash in 1987; the dot-com bubble and crash at the end of the 1990s; and then the US real estate and global commodities markets bubbles and crashes this decade.
Increasingly, the bubbles were managed cooperatively by Wall Street and Washington. Chairman Greenspan and President Clinton made a pact with Robert Rubin's Wall Street to pump up "new economy" internet stocks through "irrational exuberance". When that failed, Greenspan extolled the benefits of adjustable rate mortgages, while President Bush hawked the "ownership society". Wall Street turned America's residential real estate sector into the world's biggest casino -- $20 trillion worth of property that could serve as the basis for many tens of trillions of dollars of bets. Bernanke promoted the bubble by assuring markets that America was enjoying the "great moderation" -- a new era in which stability dominates -- and that in any case, the Fed would protect markets in the case of any hiccups.
The home finance food chain was fundamentally changed to facilitate the rapid pace of gambling that would be necessary to feed Wall Street's appetite. Real estate appraisers were paid more to over-value homes; mortgage brokers were rewarded with higher fees to induce borrowers to accept unfavorable terms; mortgage lenders got better fees for riskier loans; securitizers wanted more junky loans to increase the projected returns spit out by their own internal models that presume more risk is always rewarded with higher profits; credit raters got paid to rate trash as AAA -- as safe as treasuries; and investors shunned "plain vanilla" securities in favor of risky structured products that were so complex no one could understand them -- so that they could have any value desired. No worries, AIG sold "insurance" on all this garbage!
That homeowners would default on the unaffordable mortgages was a foregone conclusion. Indeed, it was the desired result of the business model. The preferred marketed loans tell it all: Subprimes! NINJAs! Liar's loans! Washington helpfully changed bankruptcy law to make it more difficult for a homeowner to get out of mortgage debt in preparation for the wave of defaults that everyone knew would result. Wall Street would get the homes, and homeowners would still have to pay on the debts. Then the foreclosed property would be resold, with more fees for everyone in the finance food chain, and the whole process through to default would begin again -- a nice virtuous cycle.
It might seem strange that banks would actually want default. But that is the beauty of a casino -- the house always wins, and homebuyers were gambling against the casino. On the way up, fees are collected, and on the way down fees are still collected on the foreclosures and as houses are resold. And if anything should go wrong, Washington backstops the casinos.
But it was necessary to streamline foreclosure to make it as fast and cheap as possible. Enter MERS -- another link in the food chain -- created by the banks in 1997 in preparation for the boom and bust. MERS was set up to be a foreclosure mill. It would break the centuries-old custom that protected property rights by requiring every sale of property to be publicly recorded, and requiring that any creditor claiming a right to foreclose to demonstrate clear title, with an endorsed note in the creditor's name and a record at the county office showing transfer of the property.
The banksters did not want to go through all that paperwork, and needed to subvert the transparency that would shine light on their crimes. Hence, they set up a fraudulent shell corporation that claimed to be the mortgagee; while the original sale would be recorded at the county office, subsequent sales and purchases of the mortgage would be recorded only by an "electronic handshake" between two "members" of MERS. Even that record was considered by the banksters to be purely voluntary -- MERS did not require members to actually record transactions. If they found it more convenient to conceal the transfers, that was permitted.
MERS even farmed out its name -- for 25 bucks anyone could buy the MERS trademark and use it. And in a touching display of fraternity, everyone got to be a certified vice president of MERS. (Sort of like those 1950s marketing campaigns advertised on cereal boxes -- for 25 cents, you too can be a Super Fraudster with a nifty membership ring and all the benefits of membership in an international criminal conspiracy!)
MERS deliberately undermined the legality of the loans and the records. Homeowners could no longer search the public records to find out who actually held their mortgage -- the record would show MERS as owner, but MERS was a shell corporation with no real employees. It was not a servicer, so the homeowner could not make mortgage payments to the purported owner. As a result, checks were sent to the wrong servicers; servicers credited the wrong accounts; servicers claimed delinquencies on homeowners who never missed a payment, and piled late fees and delinquencies on the wrong borrowers; sheriffs were sent to break down the doors of the wrong houses, and threw belongings out on the street in front of homes on which there was no mortgage at all. MERS purposely created the mess, at the behest of banksters who do not want mere legal technicalities to get in the way of stealing homes. The undermining of the public records was not a mistake -- it was MERS's business model, created by the member banks.
And MERS helped banksters to defraud securities holders. Banks not only separated the mortgages from the notes, but they even destroyed the notes as they entered the mortgages into MERS's electronic data base. MERS told servicers that it is "customary" practice to retain notes, not to endorse them over to REMIC trustees as required both by federal tax law and by the PSAs that govern the trusts. This made the securities a "nullity" -- as the Supreme Court ruled over a hundred years ago -- because a mortgage without a note is unenforceable in foreclosure. At best, the securities are unsecured debt, with no real property behind them.
In any case, the mortgages put into the trusts did not meet the representations made to investors -- so even if the notes had been properly endorsed over to the trusts, the securities could be turned back to the banks. By creating a completely fraudulent electronic registry system -- in which data would be entered only if banks found it convenient to do so, and in which data could be modified at any time by any member of MERS -- MERS made it easy to conceal the securities frauds. Destruction or forgery of the paperwork was absolutely necessary to cover the trail of fraud from origination of the mortgage to securitization and finally to the inevitable foreclosure. Again, destruction of documents was not a mistake. It was the business model.
http://bench craft company scam .com/]free
Memo To Fox <b>News</b>: Support The 9-11 First Responders - Rick Ungar <b>...</b>
To: Roger Ailes, CEO Re: 9/11 first responders Roger: In a rare instance of broadcast sanity, two of your anchors have come out and condemned the Senate Republicans for voting down health care for the 9/11 heroes.
The Tools of Ignorance: Sunday <b>News</b> - Pinstripe Alley
A breakdown of the Greinke trade, if the Yankees could have beat it, and what to do now.
World Exclusive: Qatar royal family will pay £1.5bn to buy <b>...</b>
Gulf state see United as an iconic acquisition to cement their name in football.
truth about bench craft company scam
Memo To Fox <b>News</b>: Support The 9-11 First Responders - Rick Ungar <b>...</b>
To: Roger Ailes, CEO Re: 9/11 first responders Roger: In a rare instance of broadcast sanity, two of your anchors have come out and condemned the Senate Republicans for voting down health care for the 9/11 heroes.
The Tools of Ignorance: Sunday <b>News</b> - Pinstripe Alley
A breakdown of the Greinke trade, if the Yankees could have beat it, and what to do now.
World Exclusive: Qatar royal family will pay £1.5bn to buy <b>...</b>
Gulf state see United as an iconic acquisition to cement their name in football.
do bench craft company scam pills work
Memo To Fox <b>News</b>: Support The 9-11 First Responders - Rick Ungar <b>...</b>
To: Roger Ailes, CEO Re: 9/11 first responders Roger: In a rare instance of broadcast sanity, two of your anchors have come out and condemned the Senate Republicans for voting down health care for the 9/11 heroes.
The Tools of Ignorance: Sunday <b>News</b> - Pinstripe Alley
A breakdown of the Greinke trade, if the Yankees could have beat it, and what to do now.
World Exclusive: Qatar royal family will pay £1.5bn to buy <b>...</b>
Gulf state see United as an iconic acquisition to cement their name in football.
fast bench craft company scam enlargement
Memo To Fox <b>News</b>: Support The 9-11 First Responders - Rick Ungar <b>...</b>
To: Roger Ailes, CEO Re: 9/11 first responders Roger: In a rare instance of broadcast sanity, two of your anchors have come out and condemned the Senate Republicans for voting down health care for the 9/11 heroes.
The Tools of Ignorance: Sunday <b>News</b> - Pinstripe Alley
A breakdown of the Greinke trade, if the Yankees could have beat it, and what to do now.
World Exclusive: Qatar royal family will pay £1.5bn to buy <b>...</b>
Gulf state see United as an iconic acquisition to cement their name in football.
bench craft company scam surgery cost
Memo To Fox <b>News</b>: Support The 9-11 First Responders - Rick Ungar <b>...</b>
To: Roger Ailes, CEO Re: 9/11 first responders Roger: In a rare instance of broadcast sanity, two of your anchors have come out and condemned the Senate Republicans for voting down health care for the 9/11 heroes.
The Tools of Ignorance: Sunday <b>News</b> - Pinstripe Alley
A breakdown of the Greinke trade, if the Yankees could have beat it, and what to do now.
World Exclusive: Qatar royal family will pay £1.5bn to buy <b>...</b>
Gulf state see United as an iconic acquisition to cement their name in football.
url
Memo To Fox <b>News</b>: Support The 9-11 First Responders - Rick Ungar <b>...</b>
To: Roger Ailes, CEO Re: 9/11 first responders Roger: In a rare instance of broadcast sanity, two of your anchors have come out and condemned the Senate Republicans for voting down health care for the 9/11 heroes.
The Tools of Ignorance: Sunday <b>News</b> - Pinstripe Alley
A breakdown of the Greinke trade, if the Yankees could have beat it, and what to do now.
World Exclusive: Qatar royal family will pay £1.5bn to buy <b>...</b>
Gulf state see United as an iconic acquisition to cement their name in football.
bench craft company scam machine
Memo To Fox <b>News</b>: Support The 9-11 First Responders - Rick Ungar <b>...</b>
To: Roger Ailes, CEO Re: 9/11 first responders Roger: In a rare instance of broadcast sanity, two of your anchors have come out and condemned the Senate Republicans for voting down health care for the 9/11 heroes.
The Tools of Ignorance: Sunday <b>News</b> - Pinstripe Alley
A breakdown of the Greinke trade, if the Yankees could have beat it, and what to do now.
World Exclusive: Qatar royal family will pay £1.5bn to buy <b>...</b>
Gulf state see United as an iconic acquisition to cement their name in football.
bench craft company scam secrets
Memo To Fox <b>News</b>: Support The 9-11 First Responders - Rick Ungar <b>...</b>
To: Roger Ailes, CEO Re: 9/11 first responders Roger: In a rare instance of broadcast sanity, two of your anchors have come out and condemned the Senate Republicans for voting down health care for the 9/11 heroes.
The Tools of Ignorance: Sunday <b>News</b> - Pinstripe Alley
A breakdown of the Greinke trade, if the Yankees could have beat it, and what to do now.
World Exclusive: Qatar royal family will pay £1.5bn to buy <b>...</b>
Gulf state see United as an iconic acquisition to cement their name in football.
bench craft company scamments
Memo To Fox <b>News</b>: Support The 9-11 First Responders - Rick Ungar <b>...</b>
To: Roger Ailes, CEO Re: 9/11 first responders Roger: In a rare instance of broadcast sanity, two of your anchors have come out and condemned the Senate Republicans for voting down health care for the 9/11 heroes.
The Tools of Ignorance: Sunday <b>News</b> - Pinstripe Alley
A breakdown of the Greinke trade, if the Yankees could have beat it, and what to do now.
World Exclusive: Qatar royal family will pay £1.5bn to buy <b>...</b>
Gulf state see United as an iconic acquisition to cement their name in football.
free bench craft company scam exercises
Memo To Fox <b>News</b>: Support The 9-11 First Responders - Rick Ungar <b>...</b>
To: Roger Ailes, CEO Re: 9/11 first responders Roger: In a rare instance of broadcast sanity, two of your anchors have come out and condemned the Senate Republicans for voting down health care for the 9/11 heroes.
The Tools of Ignorance: Sunday <b>News</b> - Pinstripe Alley
A breakdown of the Greinke trade, if the Yankees could have beat it, and what to do now.
World Exclusive: Qatar royal family will pay £1.5bn to buy <b>...</b>
Gulf state see United as an iconic acquisition to cement their name in football.
bench craft company scam drugs
Memo To Fox <b>News</b>: Support The 9-11 First Responders - Rick Ungar <b>...</b>
To: Roger Ailes, CEO Re: 9/11 first responders Roger: In a rare instance of broadcast sanity, two of your anchors have come out and condemned the Senate Republicans for voting down health care for the 9/11 heroes.
The Tools of Ignorance: Sunday <b>News</b> - Pinstripe Alley
A breakdown of the Greinke trade, if the Yankees could have beat it, and what to do now.
World Exclusive: Qatar royal family will pay £1.5bn to buy <b>...</b>
Gulf state see United as an iconic acquisition to cement their name in football.
bench craft company scam enlargement
No comments:
Post a Comment